Skip to content

Unofficial Vehicle Seizure Without Compensation

Vehicular convenience can be gained through company cars, particularly for those without personal vehicles. This is especially true when private usage is permitted, but the authority to grant this lies with the employer.

Offical Vehicle Revoked without Reimbursement?
Offical Vehicle Revoked without Reimbursement?

Unofficial Vehicle Seizure Without Compensation

In a landmark decision, the Cologne Higher Labor Court (Kölner Landesarbeitsgericht) has ruled in favour of an employee who lost their entitlement to a company car with private usage rights. The case, identified as 6 Sa 519/23, has significant implications for employees with similar arrangements in their standard employment contracts.

The employee, whose company car was recalled during a company merger in 2021, initially received a compensation payment of 600 euros for the temporary loss of the company car. However, the employee subsequently sued the new employer, demanding a monthly compensation payment.

The court's decision establishes that employees who lose their entitlement to a company car with private usage rights may have legal grounds to seek compensation equivalent to the value of the lost benefit. This is provided that such usage rights formed part of their contractual remuneration or established employment benefits.

The ruling emphasises the importance of carefully examining the contractual relationship and fair valuation of the lost benefit for potential compensation claims. The valuation is often based on the taxable benefit value as per German tax law, such as the 1% rule for private use of a company car.

However, it's worth noting that losing a company car benefit does not automatically entitle the employee to a substitute or alternative benefit, but only to appropriate compensation if the loss amounts to a remuneration reduction.

The court's decision also clarifies that employers are not obligated to compensate employees if they lose their claim to a company car, as long as the collective agreement states otherwise. In this specific case, the new employer's collective agreement did not grant the employee a claim to the car, according to Volker Görzel, a specialist lawyer for labor law.

The labor court in Siegburg awarded the plaintiff 300 euros for each of the two months without the company car. This ruling underscores the need for employers to carefully manage company car regulations, especially during periods of change such as mergers or restructuring, to avoid potential legal disputes.

Reasons for taking away a company car can include economic crises, non-compliance with regulations, or the driver being unable to work for an extended period. Employers are advised to consult with labour law specialists to ensure compliance with regulations and to minimise the risk of legal disputes.

In summary, the Cologne Higher Labor Court’s decision in case No. 6 Sa 519/23 establishes that employees who lose their entitlement to a company car with private usage rights may have legal grounds to seek compensation equivalent to the value of the lost benefit, provided that such usage rights formed part of their contractual remuneration or established employment benefits. The ruling stresses careful examination of the contractual relationship and fair valuation of the lost benefit for potential compensation claims.

The employee, whose company car was taken away during a business merger in 2021, sought a monthly compensation payment instead of the initial 600 euros compensation for the temporary loss of the company car. This decision by the Cologne Higher Labor Court highlights the potential for employees to claim compensation equivalent to the value of the lost company car benefit, if such benefit was part of their finance package or established employment benefits.

Read also:

    Latest