Company's Financial Well-being Assessment through Gross Profit Measurement
In the vast world of business, two giants, Boeing and Coca-Cola, stand out in their respective industries - aerospace and beverages. A comparative analysis of their gross profit margins (GPMs) reveals striking differences.
Boeing, a leading player in the aerospace industry, reported a gross profit of $14.026 billion in 2015. However, its GPM was not explicitly stated in the text. In comparison, Coca-Cola, a beverage industry titan, typically boasts a GPM exceeding 60%.
The differences in GPMs can be attributed to the nature of each industry. Boeing's business model is complex, with two primary categories of sales: products and services. On the other hand, Coca-Cola's operations are more straightforward, focusing primarily on the production and distribution of beverages.
Interestingly, other aerospace companies like Lockheed Martin typically have higher or similar margins to Boeing, while beverage companies such as PepsiCo have GPMs close to Coca-Cola's range, slightly lower or comparable.
Gross profit, calculated as sales revenue less the cost of goods sold or cost of services sold, offers a quick but incomplete analysis of an entity's performance. It provides insight into the health of an entity's underlying business, with higher gross profit indicating a superior brand or efficient operations. However, it does not consider all income statement line items, offering an incomplete picture of an entity's financial health.
GPM analysis is a valuable metric for investors and journalists to understand an entity's competitiveness in its industry. It can help substantiate (or refute) managers' claims of good financial performance. For instance, analysts and Boeing management are looking for improved GPMs in the near future for Boeing.
Boeing does not label its gross profit on its income statement for 2015, preferring readers to assess its gross profit categories separately. In contrast, Coca-Cola includes its gross profit on its income statement.
Higher GPMs can be a result of an entity's ability to charge higher prices or purchase or manufacture goods or provide services at a lower cost than competitors. However, gross profit analysis ignores selling, general and administrative expenses, interest expense, gains, and losses.
Many entities disclose gross profit on their income statements. Financial statement analysts often convert gross profit into a percentage for better assessment, known as Gross Profit Margin (GPM). Boeing's GPM for product sales is low compared to competitors and other industries, indicating room for improvement.
In conclusion, while Boeing and Coca-Cola operate in distinct industries, their GPMs paint a clear picture of their relative financial health. As both entities strive for improved financial performance, the spotlight remains on their GPMs as a key indicator of success.
Read also:
- Planned construction of enclosures within Görlitzer Park faces delays
- Controversy resurfaces following the elimination of diesel filter systems at Neckartor: A renewed conflict over the diesel restriction policy
- Foreign financial aid for German citizens residing abroad persists
- Ukraine experiences a transformation in overseas money transfers
