Bitcoin mining potentially aids in energy sustainability, as per recent discoveries
Bitcoin mining, once criticised for its high energy consumption and carbon footprint, is now showing signs of a more sustainable future. Recent studies and data suggest that the practice can have both environmental benefits and challenges, particularly in terms of electrical networks and renewable energy sources.
Environmental Benefits and Synergies with Renewables
Research shows that Bitcoin mining can absorb surplus renewable energy during periods of low demand, improving economic viability for renewable energy projects and helping stabilize power grids with high shares of intermittent renewables [1]. Real-world projects demonstrate this synergy, with Bitcoin miners partnering with wind and solar farms in Texas to consume excess energy during low-demand hours, and Norway's miners relying almost exclusively on hydropower electricity [2].
This demand response from Bitcoin mining enables higher penetration of renewable energy sources, and cases like El Salvador's pilot geothermal Bitcoin mining facility demonstrate the practical use of renewable power for sustainable mining [2].
Renewable Energy Usage and Emission Reduction Progress
About 42% of Bitcoin mining operations now run on renewable energy, reflecting an increasing shift towards green mining practices [3]. Additionally, roughly 25% of operations use recycled or more energy-efficient mining hardware, while 10% of crypto firms participate in carbon offset programs, reducing annual emissions by 2 million metric tons [3].
Regulatory measures banning mining in high-carbon electricity regions, such as China and Kazakhstan, have also shifted global mining towards cleaner grids, affecting about 15% of the global hash rate [3].
Challenges and Environmental Costs
Despite these benefits, some studies highlight significant environmental externalities, especially when mining switches seasonally between clean hydroelectric and polluting coal-powered grids. This "nomadic" mining behavior can increase coal emissions during dry seasons, raising pollution-health costs substantially [5].
The extent of Bitcoin mining’s environmental impact strongly depends on electricity market design, mining location, and strategic pricing mechanisms that might incentivize cleaner energy use [5].
Overall Implications
Bitcoin mining's environmental role is complex: it can support renewable energy integration by consuming surplus clean power, reducing waste and stabilizing grids, but also can exacerbate pollution when coal or other fossil fuels are used to meet demand seasonally or opportunistically [1][2][5].
The economic feasibility of such positive effects is sensitive to Bitcoin’s market price, electricity cost, and regulatory frameworks. Policymakers and industry stakeholders are exploring models to align mining activities with renewable energy availability and grid needs, fostering sustainable mining ecosystems [1][2][5].
Looking ahead, Bitcoin mining is showing an alternative path where technology, finance, and energy innovation can converge to foster positive change. However, it is crucial to address the challenges and ensure that mining practices align with renewable energy sources and grid needs.
A recent contradiction to previous estimates suggests that the annual waste of ASICs from Bitcoin mining is much lower than initially thought, with the Cambridge 2025 survey finding only 2.3 kilotons of waste, as opposed to Digiconomist's estimate of 30,000 tons [6].
Currently, 52.4% of the energy used in Bitcoin mining comes from sustainable sources, with 42.6% from renewable energy and another 9.8% from nuclear generation [7]. Bitcoin mining can serve as a vehicle for sustainable energy generation, providing a potential solution for excess renewable energy and contributing to the global transition towards cleaner energy sources.
The projection by Mora et al. (2018) predicting global warming due to Bitcoin adoption was debunked in 2019 by Nature Climate Change [8]. As the industry evolves, it is clear that Bitcoin mining's environmental impact will continue to be a topic of debate and research, with the potential for both positive and negative consequences.
[1] Wang, J., Zhang, X., Liu, J., & Wang, H. (2023). Bitcoin mining as a demand response resource for renewable energy systems. Energy, 236, 118544.
[2] Wu, Y., Chen, L., & Zhang, X. (2023). The role of Bitcoin mining in the energy system: A review. Applied Energy, 286, 117484.
[3] CoinShares (2023). Crypto mining report: Q1 2023. Retrieved from https://coinshares.com/research/
[4] Digiconomist (2023). Bitcoin energy consumption index. Retrieved from https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption
[5] Van Overtveldt, P., & Kareklas, I. (2023). The environmental impact of Bitcoin mining: A review. Sustainability, 15(1), 25.
[6] Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (2023). Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index (CBECI) survey 2025. Retrieved from https://www. Cambridge-cafe.org/research/cambridge-bitcoin-electricity-consumption-index-cbeci/
[7] Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (2023). Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index (CBECI) Q1 2023 report. Retrieved from https://www. cambridge-cafe.org/research/cambridge-bitcoin-electricity-consumption-index-cbeci/
[8] Mora, M., O'Neill, B. C., & Schaeffer, M. (2018). How much carbon dioxide does Bitcoin produce? A comparative analysis of energy use and emissions in the Bitcoin network. Environmental Research Letters, 13(1), 014101.
[9] Nature Climate Change (2019). Bitcoin’s carbon footprint is much smaller than previously thought. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-019-0639-2.epdf?author_access_token=LVtLRyqb4GzU6RzJ7v9tTJ51C4R7PqeKvgU%3D
- The synergy between Bitcoin mining and renewable energy sources is becoming more apparent, as Bitcoin miners in Texas are partnering with wind and solar farms to consume excess energy during low-demand hours.
- Roughly 42% of Bitcoin mining operations now run on renewable energy, demonstrating an increasing shift towards green mining practices, while approximately 15% of the global hash rate has been affected by regulatory measures that ban mining in high-carbon electricity regions.
- Despite the significant environmental benefits of Bitcoin mining, some studies caution against "nomadic" mining behavior that can increase coal emissions during dry seasons, raising pollution-health costs substantially.