Skip to content
All about finance. — Payoff — Inventions — Appeal — Gsm — Policy — Opinion — business — Turkcell — Finance

Tenacious Turkcell Persistently Calling MTN's Number

South African court continues to face persistent pursuit by Turkish telecoms company, Turkcell.

,   and  Administrator
3 min read
South African legal proceedings persist as Turkish telecoms giant Turkcell continues its relentless...
South African legal proceedings persist as Turkish telecoms giant Turkcell continues its relentless pursuit for resolution.

Tenacious Turkcell Persistently Calling MTN's Number

Turkish telecoms company Turkcell persists in its determined pursuit of justice, taking a South African court case against MTN Group to new heights. This legal battle, spanning over a dozen years, revolves around a GSM license award in Iran - an issue that could have easily been abandoned in pursuit of more profitable opportunities. Yet, here we are.

MTN, undoubtedly, doesn't welcome these drawn-out legalities, especially as the Supreme Court of Appeal recently ruled last week in favor of allowing Turkcell's case to be heard in South Africa. Unsurprisingly, MTN intends to take this matter further, appealing to the Constitutional Court.

The allegations leveled against MTN are severe: accusations of bribing South African and Iranian officials to overturn a public tender for a multibillion-dollar Iranian GSM telecom license initially intended for Turkcell[1][4]. Turkcell also implicates MTN in several shady dealings, including paying off South Africa's then-ambassador to Iran, bribing high-ranking Iranian officials, and funneling a $400,000 bribe through a fake consulting contract[1].

MTN maintains that Turkcell's litigation is baseless[4]. You might as well remember that when Turkcell's allegations first surfaced, MTN established an independent special committee under international jurist Lord Leonard Hoffmann. Hoffmann concluded that Turkcell's claims were largely based on a single source and were "a tapestry of lies, distortions, and inventions" from "an imaginative fabulist and conspiracy theorist"[4].

Besides dismissing claims of a conspiracy between MTN and Iranian officials to remove Turkcell from the Iranian licensing process, Hoffmann also debunked allegations that the South African government promised to provide defense equipment to Iran or support its nuclear policy[1][4]. As we wait for the dust to settle in court, hopefully, these accusations will be laid to rest once and for all.

Embracing Complexity

This high-stakes legal battle reflects the intricacies of international business and legal jurisdictions, shedding light on the serious allegations of corruption and bribery that have plagued the affair.

  • History of the Case: Turkcell alleges that in 2004 and 2005, MTN resorted to bribery and illegal activities to secure the GSM license in Iran, ultimately awarded to Irancell, in which MTN owns 49%[1][4].
  • Legal Proceedings: In 2013, Turkcell and its subsidiary, East Asian Consortium (EAC), initiated legal action against MTN Group and its subsidiaries in the High Court of South Africa, seeking damages of $4.2 billion for alleged impropriety in the license award[4]. In November 2022, the High Court of South Africa dismissed the case, concluding that the South African courts lacked jurisdiction[4]. Turkcell appealed this decision, and the case is now expected to return to the High Court for the substantive phase of the proceedings, with MTN contemplating a further appeal to the Constitutional Court[5].
  • Allegations and Counterarguments: Turkcell accuses MTN of bribery and other corrupt practices, while MTN consistently denies these claims[4]. An independent special committee formed by MTN to investigate the allegations found that they were largely unsubstantiated[4]. Nonetheless, Turkcell's appeal, accepted by the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa in April 2025, has allowed the case to proceed under South African law[1][5].

What Lies Ahead

  • MTN's Appeal: With the potential for further legal delays, MTN may appeal the jurisdiction decision to the Constitutional Court[4].
  • Substantive Proceedings: If the Constitutional Court does not overturn the lower court's decision, the High Court will handle the case under South African law, with Turkcell seeking substantial damages[5].

This protracted legal battle between Turkcell and MTN serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in international business and the importance of addressing the allegations levied against the parties involved.

  1. Turkcell's determined pursuit of justice through a South African court case against MTN Group over a GSM license in Iran highlights the company's firm belief that their opinion of MTN's policy is not baseless.
  2. The payoff resulting from MTN's alleged bribing of South African and Iranian officials to secure the Iranian GSM license, as claimed by Turkcell, questionable business practices and potential financial losses.
  3. The inventiveness of the allegations leveled against MTN, such as paying off South Africa's then-ambassador to Iran, bribing high-ranking Iranian officials, and funneling a $400,000 bribe through a fake consulting contract, is under question, as the case unfolds.
  4. The intricacies of international business and legal jurisdictions, as demonstrated in this prolonged legal battle between Turkcell and MTN, have brought to the forefront the need for strict adherence to ethical policies in the finance sector to avoid any questionable practices.

Read also:

    Related

    Latest